Monday, December 8, 2025

“I Just Want to Be Home”: Emily Ladau’s Powerful Senate Testimony and Why It Matters for Every Senior Aging in Place


On December 3, 2025, International Day of Persons with Disabilities,  disability rights advocate and author Emily Ladau delivered moving testimony to the U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging titled “
Aging in Place: The Impact of Community During the Holidays.” At just 34, Ladau shared a story that transcends age: the raw, human need to remain in the place we call home, surrounded by the people and routines that make life worth living. Her words, rooted in her own lifelong experience with disability and her family’s journey, struck at the heart of what this blog has always championed:
Home is not just a location: it is dignity, autonomy, and love made tangible.

Ladau recounted sitting with her grandfather during what would be his final holiday at home. As he opened mail in his own kitchen, he wept over the simple joy of performing an ordinary task in the place he loved. “It’s the only time I ever saw him cry,” she told the committee. That moment crystallized a truth we see every day with our clients: Being forced out of home isn’t just inconvenient, it’s a profound loss of self.
She then turned the lens on her own life. Born with a physical disability, Ladau benefited from early intervention and New York’s Medicaid Care at Home waiver, services that gave her in-home therapy, home modifications, and the power wheelchair that has been her ticket to independence. Yet, as an adult, the $2,000 Medicaid asset limit,  unchanged for over 35 years, forced an impossible choice: stay on Medicaid and remain financially trapped, or risk losing essential care to pursue marriage and career. She chose the risk, forgoing weekly in-home physical therapy she can no longer afford.
Now newly married and house-hunting in New Jersey, Ladau and her husband confront a brutal reality: accessible, affordable housing is almost nonexistent. The very supports that once kept her thriving at home are now out of reach, a warning for every senior who assumes Medicare, Medicaid, or savings will be enough.Why This Testimony Matters for Every Senior
Ladau’s story is powerful because it bridges generations. She reminded the committee that 43.9 % of adults with disabilities are 65 or older,  and that most of us who aren’t disabled today will become disabled tomorrow, whether permanently or only for a short time. The barriers she faces, rigid asset limits, scarce accessible housing, and inadequate home-care funding, are the same ones that push countless seniors into nursing homes against their will.
The numbers are stark:
  • 75% of adults 50+ want to age in place (AARP 2025), and many people living in long-term care facilities characterize it as a "fate worse than death."
  • Yet Medicaid’s $2,000 asset cap and long-term care waiting lists averaging 6–12 months force many into facilities (MACPAC 2025).
  • Once there, isolation triples depression risk, falls rise 28 % (2025 JAGS and CNA data).
Ladau’s closing line landed like a gavel:
“This isn’t just about making treasured holiday memories… It’s about fostering a country where all of us can grow older assured by the notion that we will always have a place to call home.”
What We Can Do Today Because Tomorrow Isn’t Guaranteed
Emily Ladau’s testimony is a call to action at the policy level and in our own families. While we wait for Congress to modernize Medicaid’s 1980s-era asset limits or fund HCBS at the level seniors deserve, we can act by implementing a robust Aging-in-Place Plan, including a trust, powers of attorney, advanced directives, and Supported Decision-Making Agreements. 
Emily Ladau reminded us that home is where memories are made, dignity is preserved, and love lives on. This holiday season, let her grandfather’s tears and her own fierce independence inspire you to plan,  so you, too, can open your mail in your kitchen, surrounded by the people who matter most.
While this article has provided a heartfelt reflection on Emily Ladau’s testimony, it is by no means comprehensive. The fight for actual aging-in-place policy reforms continues. Readers must remain vigilant. By combining awareness with proactive planning, families can safeguard independence and thrive as they age in place. 

Friday, December 5, 2025

Nursing Home Ownership Transparency: CMS's New Rule Promises Accountability, But Is It Enough for Seniors and Families?


In a long-overdue move toward accountability, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is ramping up requirements for nursing homes to disclose detailed ownership information, a step experts say could lead to more targeted audits and enforcement actions against facilities that deliver substandard care. The rule
requires skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) to submit comprehensive ownership data through the Medicare Provider Enrollment, Chain, and Ownership System (PECOS). Starting January 1, 2026, providers must identify not just direct owners but also influential business associates and related parties, with this information feeding into public tools like Care Compare by summer 2026. For readers of the Aging-in-Place Planning and Elderlaw Blog, this development is a double-edged sword: It holds promise for weeding out problematic operators, but its actual impact on quality and consumer choice remains uncertain amid implementation hurdles and historical enforcement gaps. We've addressed the topics of ownership and for-profit/non-profit many times,  but there is no more effective planning than proactive prevention.  In the worst cases, we offer readers tips, tricks, strategies, and tools to evaluate risk factors such as ownership and select the 'best' of available care options. This article introduces the new rule's key elements, evaluates whether it's a meaningful reform or mere window dressing, and offers strategies for seniors and families to leverage it while steering toward the safer shores of aging in place.
The Rule in a Nutshell: What CMS Is Requiring and Why Now
The CMS ownership transparency rule, finalized in late 2024 after years of delays, requires nursing homes participating in Medicare or Medicaid to update their enrollment forms (CMS-855A) with granular details on ownership structures. This includes:
  • Direct and Indirect Owners: Anyone with a 5% or more ownership stake, including private equity firms or REITs.
  • Related Parties and Associates: Managers, board members, and entities with financial influence, even if not formal owners.
  • Revalidation Process: Facilities must resubmit data off-cycle, with the first wave due January 1, 2026, and ongoing updates every 30 days for changes.
The goal? Shine a light on opaque chains that operate hundreds of homes, where ownership complexity has shielded poor performance. CMS will integrate this data into Care Compare, allowing consumers to see links between owners and quality ratings. The rule stems from post-COVID scrutiny, in which OIG audits revealed that 24% of facilities failed staffing standards amid ownership shifts.Meaningful Reform or Window Dressing? A Critical Look
On paper, the rule is a win for transparency.  Even if the federal government gridlocks or slows the pace of reform to a standstill, states appear to be stepping in "just in case," considering bills and regulations that force transparent ownership, with Maine and Oregon leading the way. 
But critically, it's window dressing without teeth: Implementation delays (from August 2024 to January 2026) and vague "influential associate" definitions burden providers without guaranteeing action. For seniors considering facilities, it may flag risks, but it's unlikely to prevent falls or ensure sufficient staffing levels. Besides, the industry's history is a pattern of short-term improvement after regulators shine a light on a facility's substandard quality, followed soon afterwards by a return to the same substandard quality that first caught regulators' attention.  Ultimately, it's meaningful for informed choice but insufficient for systemic change, reinforcing why aging in place outshines institutional care.Conclusion: Transparency as a Tool, Not a Panacea
CMS's ownership rule is a step toward light in dark corners, but families deserve more. While this article has provided a thorough overview of the developments and strategies, it is by no means comprehensive. The landscape evolves rapidly. Readers must remain vigilant. By combining awareness with proactive planning, families can safeguard independence and thrive as they age in place. For support, consult a professional.  Your security depends on proactive engagement.

Finance: Estate Plan Trusts Articles from EzineArticles.com

Home, life, car, and health insurance advice and news - CNNMoney.com

IRS help, tax breaks and loopholes - CNNMoney.com

Personal finance news - CNNMoney.com