Veterans Service and Non-Service Connected Benefits

The  Senior Veterans Service Alliance is kind to publish the following summary of benefits available to senior veterans through the Veterans Administration:

Non-Service Connected Disability Benefits

Veterans who served during a period of war or their surviving spouses may be eligible for additional income from the Department of Veterans Affairs to help pay for their long term care, out-of-pocket costs.  These benefits are called Pension and Survivors Pension.  They are also misnamed the “Aid and Attendance Benefit.”

Pension benefits are subject to income and asset restriction tests which VA scrutinizes closely during application and even years after veterans or their survivors are on claim.  Pension and Survivors Pension represent only about 9% of all individuals who are on claim for all disability income categories.  

Potential incomes up to the following upper limits are possible:

• Disabled veteran with spouse – $2,230 a month;
• Single disabled veteran –  $1,881 a month;
• Single disabled surviving spouse – $1,209 a month;
• Healthy veteran with a disabled spouse – $1,477 a month

 Service-Connected Disability Benefits

Service-connected disability benefits are available to any veteran or surviving spouse with no income or asset restriction tests.  For these benefits, the Department of Veterans Affairs does not care how much money these veterans or their survivors make or what their assets are.  The benefits listed below represent the other 91% of veterans or survivors who are on claim for disability income. 

•  A surviving spouse could be receiving DIC at $1,319.04 a month or $1,599.13 a month based on the particulars of the veteran’s death.  For a surviving spouse receiving DIC and receiving long term care services, VA will pay an additional $326.77 a month – bringing the total to $1,645.81 or $1,925.90 a month.  Some surviving spouses should be receiving a monthly income from DIC but they are not.  The Senior Veterans Service Alliance can help certain surviving spouses with applications for entitlement to DIC.
• A retired veteran on Disability Compensation at 60% or more for one rating or 70% or more combined rating – with at least one of the underlying ratings at 40% – can be paid at 100% for individual unemployability.  Disability Compensation for a veteran at 60% pays $1,113.86 a month.  A veteran receiving Compensation income for individual unemployability and paid at 100% will receive $3,057.13 a month.  A senior veteran who is housebound and being paid at a 100% rating, due to individual unemployability, could apply for an additional income allowance for being housebound – bringing the total income to $3,421.90 a month.
• An older veteran receiving Disability Compensation at a 100% rating receives $3,057.13 a month.  This 100% rated veteran who is receiving long term care services could qualify for additional income allowance for long-term care bringing total income to $3,804.04 a month.

Vietnam Era Veterans, Who with Aging, Have Developed Conditions Such As Diabetes, Heart Disease, Certain Forms of Cancer and Parkinson's Disease

A veteran, who is one of 2.2 million living veterans who served in-country in Vietnam, can get additional income.  By showing evidence of one or more of the conditions above, a Vietnam veteran can receive additional income starting at $140.05 a month and going up to the possibility of $3,057 a month.

Older Single Veterans with Worsening Hearing Loss or Tinnitus

Service-connected hearing loss or tinnitus starts at $140.05 a month and goes up to the possibility of $3,057.13 a month for an older senior veteran who qualifies.  A rating for hearing loss/tinnitus of 10% or more will entitle the veteran to Veterans Health Care which is entirely free except for inexpensive prescription drug costs.  This person can then receive free hearing aids, free hearing aid batteries, free eyeglasses and substantial discounts on prescription drugs.

VA Rule Changes to Aid & Attendance Effective 10/18/2018

The Veteran's Administration has published new rules regarding Aid and Attendance eligibility.  These rule changes were long anticipated, but now become effective October 18, 2018, thirty days after publication which occurred on September 18th, 2018.  Applications and transfers prior to that date are governed by the old rules.

THE NEW RULES

Three-Year Look-Back For Asset Transfers: Beginning October 18, 2018, there will be a 3-year look back on asset transfers for less than fair market value. Previously you could transfer assets in one month, and apply for benefits the next month with no look back at all. The 3-year look back has eliminated the option of last-minute planning with immediate benefits. Note however, that any transfer prior to October 18, 2018 will be protected and not subject to the new laws; however, the transfers need to be made strategically in the right way.


Penalty for Asset Transfers: Transfers made during the look-back period will be subject to a penalty period (a period of ineligibility) that can last up to 5 years. The penalty is calculated by using a set amount as a divisor (the monthly MAPR for a veteran with one dependent, which is currently $2,169.00 per month for Improved Pension with Aid & Attendance), regardless of whether the application is for a surviving spouse or a qualifying veteran. Once determined, the penalty period begins on the first day of the month that follows the last asset transferred.


Net Worth Test: The prior “asset test” was “sufficient means” which was generally around the $80,000 mark. Under the new regulations, the asset limit is now set at $123,600 for 2018 and increased each year with inflation. The asset test takes into account all assets (minus the primary residence and personal belongings like cars) plus annual gross income, minus permissible medical expenses. Be sure to check with an experienced attorney who is also accredited agent by the VA to determine whether your assets are countable or exempt under the new laws.


Allowable Medical Expenses: The changes now allow qualified veterans and widows to deduct Independent Living Facilities expenses as a deductible medical expense as long as a physician, physician assistant, certified nurse practitioner, or clinical nurse specialist says that the person EITHER needs assistance with 2 ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) OR supervision due to cognitive or physical limitations. Previously only home care, assisted living and nursing home care costs were allowed as deductions.

CALL TO ACTION!

If you are a Veteran or Widow(er) of a Veteran and want or need help paying long term care costs, you should:

• Contact a VA  Elderlaw Attorney as soon as possible to determine if you would benefit from VA Benefits Planning.
• Complete ALL asset protection planning before the October 18th deadline. All transfers that occur prior to October 18th will not be penalized under the new rules, even if an application for benefits is filed after that date. To be protected from the impact of the new rules, all planning should be completed by October 18th.

If you provide services for Veterans, you and your team need to know about these new rules. Contact our office to find out about upcoming educational workshops and training opportunities on the VA’s updated rules or to refer your clients directly to us as time is of the essence.

Read the new rules and a discussion of the changes here: Net Worth, Asset Transfers, and Income Exclusions for Needs-Based Benefits.

Read the following prior articles published on this blog regarding the changes:

• Proposed VA Regs Would Create Transfer Penalties for Pension Applicants
• NAELA Says the VA Could Be Sued If Proposed Transfer Regs Are Enacted

NAELA Says the VA Could Be Sued If Proposed Transfer Regs Are Enacted

In its response to the Department of Veterans Affairs’ proposed regulations that would establish a look-back period and asset transfer penalties for pension claimants, the National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys’ (NAELA) raises the prospect that the VA could be sued if the rules take effect.  

As previously reported, proposed Section § 3.276 would establish a 36-month look-back period and a penalty period of up to 10 years for those who dispose of assets to qualify for a VA pension. Currently, there is no prohibition on transferring assets prior to applying for needs-based benefits, such as Aid and Attendance. 

“[W]e express the serious concern that the proposed rule’s 3-year look-back period and transfer of assets penalty exceed statutory authority, opening up VA to future litigation and causing additional uncertainty for Veterans and their families,” write Bradley J. Frigon, NAELA’s president, and Victoria Collier, Chair of NAELA’s VA Task Force, in March 17, 2015, comments on the proposed rules.

Frigon and Collier argue that the proposed rules do not meet the standard of either an explicit or implicit delegation by congressional statute that the U.S. Supreme Court set forth in Chevron USA, Inc. v. NRDC, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984).  They point out that Congress had the opportunity from 2012 to 2014 to create Medicaid-like transfer rules but that each proposal died in session.

NAELA’s comments also maintain that the proposed transfer penalties exception is too narrow.  “Veterans and their surviving spouses will be unjustly penalized for prior transfers that had absolutely nothing to do with VA pension eligibility," Frigon and Collier write. “Gifts to children at holidays and birthdays will be penalized. Donations to places of worship will be penalized. Contributions to charities will be penalized. All because there is a presumption that the transfer was made for the purpose of qualifying for VA pension. . . . The final rule should require that transfers only made for the sole purpose of qualifying for VA pension be penalized.”

The 27-page comments highlight a number of other flaws in the proposed regulation, including that it should allow for partial cures, that the time allowed to cure transfers should be expanded, that the rule disproportionately harms surviving spouses of veterans, and that the proposed net worth limits are harsher than Medicaid’s limits.

Alimony Obligation May Require Involuntary VA Admission

Victor Rizzolo and Barbara Jones divorced when Mr. Rizzolo was 84 years old. The court ordered Mr. Rizzolo to pay Ms. Jones alimony. Five years later, Mr. Rizzolo's health began to fail, so he moved in with son, who hired a caregiver for him.

Mr. Rizzolo asked the court to end the alimony payments, arguing that his income -- which was limited to VA disability payments and Social Security -- was needed to pay the caregiver. The trial court ruled against Mr. Rizzolo, finding that he had not done all that he could to meet his alimony obligations; if he entered a VA facility, the court found that he would be able to receive care and pay the alimony.  Because the court did not end the alimony obligation, Mr. Rizzolo appealed.  Perhaps he wishes he had not appealed, because, although the appeals court ruled in his favor, the court remanded the case describing an ominous potential outcome- his involuntary institutionalization in order to preserve his income for payment of alimony. 

The New Jersery Superior Court, Appellate Division, reversed, holding that the trial court did not hear evidence about whether entering a VA facility was really appropriate. According to the court, "although the [trial] court may on remand conclude that it is equitable to require [Mr. Rizzolo] to enter a VA facility against his wishes in order to use his limited income to continue to pay alimony, allowing [Ms. Jones] to preserve her assets until [Mr. Rizzolo's] death makes alimony no longer available, it may only do so upon consideration of competent evidence and a qualitative analysis of both parties' circumstances."

The court ruled that the trial court must first consider all the evidence before it can order an 89-year-old veteran in failing health to enter a Veteran's Administration (VA) facility against his will in order to ensure he had enough assets to pay alimony. Sometimes one can only exclaim, "wow!"  See, Rizzolo v. Jones (N.J. Super. Ct., App. Div., No. A-1800-13T2, March 2, 2015).  

Hopefully, his son will seek to introduce evidence regarding the relative quality of care available at home versus that available in an institution, and the court will consider carefully his quality of life concerns vis-a-vis his financial obligations. See, for example my articles, "One-Third of Nursing Home Residents Harmed In Treatment," Hapatitis Infection Risk in Nursing Homes Up 50%; Infection Risk Across the Board Increases, and "Most Terminal Dementia Patients in Nursing Homes Given Pointless and Potentially Dangerous Drugs"

For the full text of this decision, go to:
http://njlaw.rutgers.edu/collections/courts/appellate/a1800-13.opn.html

Proposed VA Regs Would Create Transfer Penalties for Pension Applicants

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is proposing regulations that would establish an asset limit, a look-back period and asset transfer penalties for claimants applying for VA needs-based benefits.  Currently, there is no prohibition on transferring assets prior to applying for needs-based benefits, such as Aid and Attendance. 

In its explanation of the new regulations in the January 23, 2015 Federal Register, the VA says the changes are a response to a 2012 Government Accountability Office (GAO) report, which it states recommended changes to “to maintain the integrity of VA’s needs-based benefit programs.” The VA also offers as a reason for the new rules to “reduce opportunities for attorneys and financial advisors to take advantage of pension claimants.”

The proposed rules would establish a 36-month look-back period and a penalty period of up to 10 years for those who dispose of assets to qualify for a VA pension. The penalty period would be calculated based on the total assets transferred during the look-back period to the extent they would have exceeded a new net worth limit that the rules also establish.  The proposed net worth limit would be equal to Medicaid’s maximum community spouse resource allowance (CSRA) prevailing at the time the final rule is published and would be indexed for inflation as the CSRA is.

The amount of a claimant’s net worth would be determined by adding the claimant’s annual income to his or her assets. The VA would not consider a claimant’s primary residence, including a residential lot area not to exceed two acres, as an asset.  But if the residence is sold, proceeds from the sale would be assets unless used to purchase another residence within the calendar year of the sale. Any penalty period would begin the first day of the month that follows the last asset transfer, and the divisor would be the applicable maximum annual pension rate in effect as of the date of the pension claim.

The proposed rule also defines and clarifies what the VA considers to be a deductible medical expense for all of its needs-based benefits, and proposes statutory changes pertaining to pension beneficiaries who receive Medicaid-covered nursing home care.

The proposed rules appear to be an effort to circumvent Congress, where legislation similar to that proposed in the new regulations has been languishing for the past two years.

The proposed rules are also quite harsh when compared to the five year look-back used for Medicaid.  Although there is no explanation for the need for a longer look-back period, the fact that there is no resource recovery available to the VA may explain the longer period.  Of course, it is also possible that the government is signalling a willingness to use more strenuous measures in determining eligibility for government benefits generally, which may later translate to a similarly longer look-back for Medicaid purposes.  

Of course, more stringent regulation of eligibility may also serve the interest in the federal government seeing states enforce, and if necessary, adopt filial responsibility laws.  For more information, see my previous articles here, here, here, and here.

To read the proposed rules in 80 Federal Register 3840-3864 (23 Jan 2015), click here.  Comments must be received on or before March 24, 2015.

Veterans and Their Families Missing Benefit Opportunities

According to the most recent VA demographic report, there is an estimated U.S. veterans population of over 21 million, with approximately 2 million being WWII veterans. Of the total population, approximately 322,000 of these veterans are receiving VA non-service connected pension benefits. The number of surviving spouses receiving pension benefits is roughly 318,000. These statistics begged Karen McIntyre, President Veterans Information Services, Inc., to ask, "Why so Few?"

She recently wrote in the Veterans Information Services, Inc., newsletter, Veterans Family Matters that:

Non-service connected pension benefits are a needs based VA benefit for war time veterans and their surviving dependents. These benefits have absolutely nothing to do with an injury, condition, or death related to military service. Even though these benefits are needs based, the veteran or dependent does not have to be poor to receive them, because medical expenses such as Medicare and insurance premiums, prescriptions, full costs of assisted living, doctor and hospital co-pays, etc. are used to offset income and assets. 

Although some veterans and surviving spouses are obviously not eligible due to their financial situation or non-wartime service there is a huge number who are eligible, but do not know it. Unfortunately, the ability for our veterans and their families to get financial assistance for medical care has been a well kept secret that is just now being "let out of the bag". 

A single veteran, who served 90 days active duty with even one day during a qualified war time, may be eligible for up to $1,758.00 per month to help pay for home care, assisted living, nursing home care, and other medical necessities. A married veteran may be eligible for up to $2,085.00 per month, a surviving spouse for up to $1,130.00 per month, and a veteran married to a veteran for up to $2,790.00 per month. None of this money affects Social Security or other sources of income and ALL is tax free to the claimant.

Sadly, many vets and their families are unaware of these benefits.

Others incorrectly assume that they are ineligible, or relying upon shoddy assessments and/or poor advice, believe that there is nothing that they can do to become eligible for these benefits.  Others confuse the standards for eligibility with those for Medicaid. Eligibility planning for veterans benefits is very different than planning for Medicaid eligibility, and there are, as a result, a wider array of opportunities to qualify for these benefits.

If you know a veteran, pass this information along.  At a minimum, we owe those who served, and the families that sacrificed for and with them, an obligation to ensure that they receive what is promised to them.