When state and federal agencies proclaim support for aging in place and home based care, there is reason to doubt their resolve. A recent example can be found courtesy of a court case against the Oregon Department of Human Services (DHS). A court has ordered Oregon DHS to restore previous levels of in-home care services, at least temporarily, to people with intellectual and developmental disabilities in a federal lawsuit contesting recent cuts.
DHS determines every year how many hours of in-home care someone with an intellectual or developmental disability is eligible to receive. Disability Rights Oregon, an advocacy organization that filed the suit last week, objects to how those decisions are made, saying the process lacks clarity.
The lawsuit alleges that under federal law, the agency violated the civil and due process rights of Oregonians receiving these services, as well as the Medicaid requirement that the Office of Developmental Disabilities Services must provide such services “as needed.” Last year, the agency implemented a new assessment method on a rolling basis, which the lawsuit argues resulted in a reduction of in-home care hours for many people — although the amount of help they needed at home had not changed. Not all people receiving in-home care services have yet felt reductions, because the changes have been implemented gradually.
In 2013, after the expansion of Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act, and a specific federal funding option called the Community First Choice Plan that provided funds so people with disabilities could access community-based services, there were significant increases in those eligible for in-home care — and in costs to the state. In 2015, Oregon legislators agreed to pay for the unanticipated costs in the upcoming budget cycle, but asked DHS to come up with a way to contain the rate of cost growth in the future. That became the method that advocates are now contesting in court. Cost of care
The Department of Human Services makes up a significant chunk of the state’s approximately $20 billion general fund budget, which lawmakers are busy trying to balance in the face of an approximately $1.6 billion shortfall. Reducing in-home care for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities by 30 percent, as DHS had planned prior to the court order, would have saved the state’s general fund a comparatively paltry $6 million in the upcoming two-year budget.
Cost considerations, i.e., saving $6 million of a $1.6 billion shortfall, could send people with intellectual and developmental disabilities currently being treated at home to foster care, group homes, and skilled nursing facilities. To put this in context, a state audit found that Oregon Health Plan caseworkers were “knowingly” extending benefits to illegal immigrants and unqualified people. Also, 4,400 people who were above the income limits still received benefits. The total cost to Oregon taxpayers is $4.3 million a year. Further, an Oregonian survey helped to unveil $1.4 billion in uncollected debts to the state. It appeared that most state agencies have a collection problem and the actual cost may be even higher than $1.4 billion. Among the examples was a business that bought $50,000 of supplies made by blind workers under the State Commission for the Blind, for which they never paid.
Home and community based care, it would seem, is a too-easy target for money-grubbing administrators.
This article is heavily reliant upon the article found here.