Medicaid: Beyond Nursing Homes, A Lifeline for Aging in Place

ID 80585074 © One Photo | Dreamstime.com

For many, Medicaid is synonymous with funding long-term institutional care, such as nursing homes, for qualifying seniors with limited income and assets. This perception is understandable; Medicaid is indeed a critical safety net for covering costly nursing facility stays when seniors can no longer manage independently.  What’s less widely known, however, is that Medicaid also offers a robust array of benefits designed to help seniors age in place, allowing them to remain in their homes or communities with dignity and independence. From home health aides to home modifications and adult day programs, Medicaid’s home and community-based services (HCBS) can provide essential support for seniors who wish to avoid institutionalization. 

This article explores how Medicaid’s lesser-known benefits can empower seniors to stay in their homes safely, offering practical insights for families navigating the complexities of long-term care planning.

What Medicaid Pays For
Medicaid, a joint federal-state program, provides health coverage to eligible low-income individuals, including seniors. Benefits vary by state due to federal guidelines allowing flexibility. Generally, Medicaid covers a broad range of medical and long-term care services, which are critical for supporting health and independence. Core services include:

• Mandatory Benefits (required by federal law for all states):
  • Inpatient and outpatient hospital services
  • Physician services
  • Nursing facility services for individuals 21 and older
  • Home health services for those eligible for nursing facility care
  • Laboratory and X-ray services
  • Early and periodic screening, diagnostic, and treatment services (EPSDT) for children
  • Federally qualified health center and rural health clinic services
  • Transportation to medical care
• Optional Benefits (states may choose to cover, and most do to varying extents):
  • Prescription drugs
  • Physical, occupational, and speech therapy
  • Dental and vision services
  • Hospice care
  • Personal care services
  • Case management
  • Home and community-based services (HCBS)

Medicaid Benefits for Seniors to Support Aging in Place
For seniors aiming to age in place—remaining in their homes or communities rather than moving to nursing facilities—Medicaid’s long-term services and supports (LTSS) are particularly relevant. These services, often provided through optional benefits or specific programs, help seniors maintain independence by addressing health, functional, and social needs. Below are key Medicaid benefits that assist with aging in place, focusing on those most relevant for seniors:

-Home Health Services

• What’s Covered: Skilled nursing, home health aide services (e.g., assistance with bathing, dressing), medical supplies (e.g., catheters, wound dressings), and sometimes therapy services for homebound seniors.
• How It Helps: Enables seniors with chronic conditions or post-hospitalization needs to receive professional care at home, reducing the need for institutionalization. For example, a senior recovering from surgery can get wound care or physical therapy at home.
• Eligibility: Typically requires a physician’s order and eligibility for nursing facility care.

-Personal Care Services (PCS)

• What’s Covered: Assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) like bathing, dressing, eating, and mobility, provided by aides in the senior’s home.
• How It Helps: Supports seniors with functional limitations, allowing them to stay independent without needing 24/7 nursing home care. For instance, an aide might help a senior with arthritis manage daily routines.
• Availability: Offered in most states as an optional benefit, though coverage and hours vary.

-Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS)

• What’s Covered: Through HCBS waivers (e.g., 1915(c) waivers), states provide tailored services like:
  • Adult day health programs (social and medical services in a community setting)
  • Home-delivered meals
  • Respite care for caregivers
  • Case management to coordinate services
  • Transportation to medical or social services
  • Home modifications (e.g., ramps, grab bars, widened doorways)
  • Assistive technology (e.g., fall detection systems, medication dispensers)
• How It Helps: HCBS waivers are designed to prevent or delay nursing home placement by supporting seniors in their homes or communities. For example, a senior with mobility issues might get a wheelchair ramp installed or attend an adult day program to socialize while their caregiver rests.
• Eligibility: Requires meeting nursing facility level of care criteria, with income and asset limits (often aligned with Supplemental Security Income standards, e.g., $943/month for an individual in 2025). States may have waitlists due to funding caps.

-Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE)

• What’s Covered: A comprehensive program for dual-eligible seniors (those with both Medicare and Medicaid) that integrates medical, social, and long-term care services. Includes home care, adult day care, primary care, therapies, and transportation.
• How It Helps: PACE enables frail seniors to live at home by providing coordinated care, often through a day center where they receive services while returning home at night. For example, a senior with dementia might get medication management and social activities through PACE.
• Availability: Limited to areas with PACE providers; not all states offer it.

-Transportation

• What’s Covered: Rides to medical appointments, pharmacies, or community services, often via vans or ride-sharing programs.
• How It Helps: Ensures seniors can access healthcare and social activities, reducing isolation and supporting independence. For instance, a senior without a car can get to a doctor’s visit or the grocery store.
• Availability: Varies by state; some include non-medical trips (e.g., to senior centers).

-Hospice Care

• What’s Covered: End-of-life care, including pain management, emotional support, and home-based services for terminally ill seniors.
• How It Helps: Allows seniors to spend their final months at home with dignity, supported by nurses, aides, and counselors.
• Eligibility: Requires a prognosis of six months or less to live.

Key Considerations for Seniors

• Eligibility Challenges: Medicaid eligibility for seniors typically requires low income and assets (e.g., under $2,000 in countable assets for an individual, excluding a home or car in many cases). Spousal impoverishment rules protect a community spouse’s income and assets. Elder law attorneys can help with strategies like trusts to meet eligibility without depleting resources.
• State Variations: Benefits like HCBS depend on state programs. For example, Nebraska (relevant to Filyaw v. Corsi) offers HCBS waivers but faced scrutiny for notice issues, highlighting the need for clear communication.
• Application Process: Applying for HCBS or PACE often involves functional assessments and may face waitlists. Early planning is critical.
• Integration with Medicare: Dual-eligible seniors can combine Medicare (for hospital/doctor visits) and Medicaid (for LTSS) to maximize coverage for aging in place.

Practical Steps for Seniors and Families

• Contact Your State Medicaid Agency: Check available HCBS waivers or PACE programs in your area. Use Medicaid.gov to find state contacts.
• Consult an Elder Law Attorney: Ensure eligibility and explore asset protection strategies to maintain Medicaid benefits.
• Plan for Notices: As seen in Filyaw v. Corsi (150 F.4th 936, 8th Cir. Aug. 27, 2025), promptly appeal termination notices (ideally within 10 days) to preserve benefits during review.
• Explore Community Resources: Local Area Agencies on Aging can connect seniors to Medicaid-funded programs or alternatives.

By leveraging these Medicaid benefits, seniors can access the support needed to age in place safely and comfortably, preserving independence while managing healthcare and functional needs. For personalized guidance, reach out to a local elder law professional or Medicaid office to navigate your state’s offerings. 

Inwood National Bank v. Fagin and Its Implications for Farmers and Small Business Owners

As individuals  plan for their legacy, the intersection of estate planning, business ownership, and elder law becomes increasingly critical, especially for farmers and small business owners who often rely on closely held business interests to sustain their families. A recent Texas Supreme Court decision, Inwood National Bank v. Fagin, No. 24-0055 (January 31, 2025), offers valuable insights into the complexities of transferring such interests into trusts, particularly when contractual restrictions and personal reconsiderations come into play. This case, while rooted in Texas law, has broad implications for Ohio and Missouri residents and others navigating similar challenges, especially those in agriculture or small enterprises.

Case OverviewThe Inwood National Bank v. Fagin case centered on Christy Fagin, who sought to transfer shares of Inwood Bancshares, Inc. (an S corporation) into a Qualified Subchapter S Trust (QSST) for her husband, Kyle, as part of estate planning. The shares were governed by a shareholder agreement requiring Inwood’s approval for transfers. The trust document listed the shares on Schedule A with the notation that Christy “intends” to transfer them upon Inwood’s approval. After initiating the process—prompted by the need to replace a lost share certificate—Christy reconsidered, realizing the transfer would make the shares Kyle’s separate property, irrevocable due to the QSST election. She withdrew her intent, never surrendering her replacement certificate, and Inwood did not countersign the necessary subscription agreement. Kyle sued Inwood for tortious interference, claiming the QSST owned the shares, but the Texas Supreme Court reversed the appeals court, ruling that the transfer was never complete due to the unfulfilled condition of Inwood’s approval.Legal AnalysisThe Court held that the transfer was subject to a condition precedent (Inwood’s approval), which was not satisfied despite the trust’s irrevocability. The conditional language on Schedule A distinguished this from an immediate gift, and the lack of bilateral performance (e.g., certificate surrender, countersignature) underscored that no enforceable contract existed. This decision aligns with prior cases like Smaldino v. Commissioner, which addressed transfer tax implications, but Inwood emphasizes the primacy of contractual conditions over trust intent when external approvals are required.Implications for Farmers and Small Business OwnersFor farmers and small business owners, this case highlights several key considerations:

• Transfer Restrictions in Business Agreements:  Many family farms and small businesses operate under shareholder agreements, LLC operating agreements, or buy-sell agreements that restrict equity transfers, often requiring management or co-owner approval. For instance, a farmer transferring farmland or equipment interests into an irrevocable trust to protect assets for Medicaid eligibility must navigate these restrictions. Evem a conveyance of business interests to a revocable trust must orient transfer considering these restrictions. Inwood clarifies that failure to secure approval renders the transfer incomplete, potentially leaving assets exposed to creditors or unintended heirs.

• Irrevocable Trust Challenges: Irrevocable trusts are popular for elder law planning to shield assets from nursing home costs, but Inwood underscores the risk if the grantor reconsiders mid-process. A farmer funding a trust with a 50% stake in a family LLC might change their mind upon realizing it reduces their control or income, as Christy did. The case suggests that until all conditions (e.g., co-owner consent) are met, the grantor can retract, but this delay could jeopardize Medicaid planning if within the 5-year look-back period (42 U.S.C. § 1396p).

• Revocable Trust Challenges:  Revocable trusts are often utilized by farmers and small business owners to orient their estate administration privately, outside of probate.  Trusts typically make challenge and contests more difficult by, among other things, including a "No-Contest" clause.  Failure, however, to properly assign, transfer, or convey business interests might open the trust estate estate to challenge or contest particulalrly, as is often the case, farming heirs are treated differently than non-farming heirs.  Non-farming heirs would not have to contest the trust, but the failure to properly convey business interests to the trust.

• Estate Planning Precision:  The decision emphasizes the need for precise drafting. Listing assets on a trust schedule with conditional language (e.g., “subject to approval”) protects against premature transfer claims, but farmers must ensure all parties, trustees, co-owners, and legal counsel, align on procedures. A small business owner transferring a machinery business interest might face disputes if the trust assumes ownership without formal transfer, as seen in Kyle’s failed claim.

• Marital and Succession Planning:  The Fagin’s marital discord post-transfer attempt mirrors issues common in family-run operations. A farmer transferring assets to a spouse’s trust might reconsider if it alters property division in a potential divorce. Inwood supports the grantor’s right to withdraw before completion, offering flexibility but requiring clear documentation to avoid litigation, as Kyle pursued.

• Elder Law and Medicaid Considerations:  
  For aging farmers or business owners seeking Medicaid, a disclaimer to redirect assets (e.g., to a child’s trust) could be affected by transfer restrictions. If approval is pending and the grantor retracts, as in Inwood, it may not trigger a penalty, but any subsequent transfer attempt within the look-back period could be scrutinized. Consulting an elder law attorney is crucial to document intent and timing.

Key Takeaways

• Contractual Compliance: Farmers and small business owners must strictly adhere to business agreement terms (e.g., approval processes) when funding trusts. Oral agreements or partial steps, as in Inwood, won’t suffice.
• Drafting Clarity: Trust schedules should explicitly note conditional transfers, avoiding assumptions of immediate ownership. This protects against disputes and ensures alignment with business governance.
• Flexibility and Risk: The ability to retract a transfer offers flexibility but risks delaying asset protection strategies, especially for Medicaid planning. Early coordination with co-owners and counsel is essential.
• Legal Guidance: Given the case’s emphasis on procedural rigor, engaging experienced estate and elder law attorneys is vital to navigate restrictions and protect generational wealth.

ConclusionInwood National Bank v. Fagin serves as a cautionary tale and a planning tool for farmers and small business owners. It reinforces that contractual conditions trump trust intent until fully executed, offering a safety net to reconsider but demanding meticulous execution. For Ohio and Missouri rresidents, where family farms and small businesses are cornerstones of rural economies, this ruling underscores the need for tailored estate plans that balance control, protection, and succession. Consult an attorney to align your trust funding with business agreements and elder law goals, ensuring your legacy thrives for future generations.