When an individual, often a senior, becomes unable to manage his or her finances and personal decisions, and has not created a legal structure for trusted surrogates to take over decision-making (through a power of attorney, health care directive and a trust) a state court may appoint a guardian or conservator (depending on the state law and the powers to be granted) to step in and take care of the incapacitated person. In most cases, this responsibility falls on a family member who has the relative’s best interest at heart. These court-appointed guardians are bound by law to act in the best interest of their ward, so even if the responsibility falls upon a person that is not a family member who has the best interest of the ward at heart, the guardian is supposed to behave as if he or she does does.
But, a recently-issued report by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) suggest that this is not always the case. The report, surveying selected guardianship cases over a twenty year period, disclosed finding instances where family and non-family members alike have been appointed by courts, and subsequently abused or neglected the persons they were appointed to protect. The GAO identified hundreds of allegations of physical abuse, neglect and financial exploitation by guardians in 45 states and the District of Columbia between 1990 and 2010.
But, a recently-issued report by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) suggest that this is not always the case. The report, surveying selected guardianship cases over a twenty year period, disclosed finding instances where family and non-family members alike have been appointed by courts, and subsequently abused or neglected the persons they were appointed to protect. The GAO identified hundreds of allegations of physical abuse, neglect and financial exploitation by guardians in 45 states and the District of Columbia between 1990 and 2010.