Court Rejects State Effort to Exploit Power of Appointment in Irrevocable Trust for Medicaid

As a result of a recent holding, the State of Massachusetts was ultimately unsuccessful in its effort to exploit a somewhat common term in irrevocable trusts designed for Medicaid and governments benefits planning, and for broader asset protection planning, in order to make trust assets available for Medicaid.

Emily Misiaszek created an irrevocable trust, placed her house in the trust, and named her daughter, Patricia Fournier, as the trustee. The trust stated that its purpose was to manage Ms. Misiaszek’s assets to allow her to age in place, specifically to live in the community as long as possible. The Trust stated that the principal of the trust "should" be held until the termination of the trust, but it gave Ms. Misiaszek a limited lifetime power of appointment to appoint all or any portion of the trust principal to a nonprofit or charitable organization provided that she had no controlling interest in the charity. 

Ms. Misiaszek entered a nursing home and applied for Medicaid (called MassHealth in Massachusetts). The state denied her benefits, claiming that the assets in the trust were available because the trust permitted Ms. Misiaszek to appoint the trust principal to a charity.  Massachusetts argued that "charity," could include a nonprofit nursing home to pay for her care.  Because federal law  provides "if there are any circumstances under which payment from the trust could be made to or for the benefit of the individual, the portion of the corpus from which, or the income on the corpus from which, payment to the individual could be made shall be considered resources available to the individual," Massachusetts considered the power of appointment a circumstance, thus making the trust assets countable.  See, 42 U.S.C. § 1396p(d)(3)(B)(i).  State law provides that "[t]he effect of the ['any circumstances'] test is that if the trustee is afforded even a 'peppercorn of discretion' to make payment of principal to the applicant, or if the trust allows such payment based on certain conditions, then the entire amount that the applicant could receive under 'any state of affairs' is the amount counted for Medicaid eligibility."

Ms. Misiaszek appealed, arguing that the assets in the trust were not countable. The state affirmed the denial, and Ms. Misiaszek appealed to court. The trial court reversed the state’s decision. The state appealed, arguing again that because the trust did not contain language expressly preventing transfers of principal to benefit Ms. Misiaszek, she could use her limited power of appointment to pay for her care.

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court held that the trust is not an available asset, affirming the lower state court's decision.  Fournier v. Secretary of the Executive Office of Health and Human Services (Mass., No. SJC-13059, July 23, 2021). According to the Court, the trust did not contain any language allowing Ms. Misiaszek to benefit personally from any distribution of trust principal; rather, the trust reflected Ms. Misiaszek’s intent to preserve the principal for her children. The court ruled “that under the terms of her trust, [Ms.] Misiaszek's limited power of appointment does not allow her, in any circumstance, to appoint the trust principal for her benefit, and thus the trust principal is not ‘countable’ for purposes of determining her eligibility for MassHealth benefits.” Fournier, at p. 25.  

The Court noted that:

"'properly structured, [irrevocable] trusts may be used to place assets beyond the settlor's reach and without adverse effect on the settlor's Medicaid eligibility'). In short, for trust principal to be considered countable under the 'any circumstances' test, the terms of the trust must give the applicant a direct path to reach or benefit from the trust principal" [citations omitted].

Fournier, at p. 7.  

A power of appointment such as the one provided in Ms. Misiaszek's trust is often included in order to qualify the trust as a "Grantor Trust," under the Internal Revenue Code.  Why?  A Grantor Trust does not require a separate Taxpayer Identification Number, and is not required to file a separate tax return.  A power of appointment permits the use of an irrevocable trust to obtain an objective, such as shielding assets from creditors or protecting assets from spend down in the event of long term care need, without suffering some of the tax and administrative disadvantages of an irrevocable trust.  Typically,  exercise of the power of appointment is usually considered unlikely and unnecessary; it serves only to make the trust a more acceptable planning vehicle.